{bbname}
返回列表 发新帖

为什么没人评测帝王7?

[复制链接]
发表于 2016-11-9 15:09  | 显示全部楼层 | 阅读模式
我觉得他的重量特诱人,简直是异类!加上广角,简直是户外精选
发表于 2016-11-9 15:45  | 显示全部楼层
大家都说好,就没有人测了。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2016-11-9 15:51  | 显示全部楼层
2,3年前测评的人多,现在有了国产平场ED,帝王7的性价比就不突出了。

重量轻主要靠多用塑料,这个不难做到。

点评

嗯,说点仁话不容易,能改就好,以后多加注意!  发表于 2016-11-9 21:33
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2016-11-9 15:51  | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 棱丝 于 2016-11-9 15:54 编辑

I’ve never tried to hide the fact that, in my opinion, real binoculars start from a 30 mm objective lens. I can consider something with 8x28 parameters as a pair of binoculars as well but only at a push. Such inventions as 8x20 or 10x25 devices have just one asset: their small dimensions. Apart from that they represent quite a collection of serious flaws - poor ergonomics, slippery, uncomfortable grip, a narrow apparent field of view and a pitch-black image. Small wonder I am more interested in 8x30 binoculars – still small but handy and optically good. Such equipment can be recommended to any fan of daytime trips or excursions. A 30 mm objective lens joined with 8x magnification ratio provides sensible surface brightness of the image and different producers can offer an apparent field of view as large as 8 degrees. Such a pair of binoculars is devoid of many flaws which plague 8x20 and 10x25 models still remaining very small and handy.

The Nikon Monarch 7 8x30, presented not so long ago, seems to be a perfect candidate for great success – it is really small and handy. It can be noticed perfectly well in the photo below where it is positioned next to one of the smallest 8x32 class pairs of binoculars, the Leica Ultravid 8x32 HD. What’s more, it weighs just 435 grams and boasts a wide apparent field of view, amounting to 8.3 degrees. Apart from that you don’t have to spend as much on it as you must pay for the Leica or the Swarovski Companion CL 8X30, which is very similar to the Nikon tested here.

Officially everything looks just peachy – time for the reality check. You can start with the build quality. Despite the fact that this pair of binoculars costs about 500 USD it is produced in China. Not so long ago such an amount of money was enough to buy you a decent piece of equipment with an inscription ‘Made in Japan’; the situation has changed, though. To tell you the truth everything would be quite all right if only it didn’t entail the lowering of build quality. In the case of the Monarch 7 we are worried about obvious slacks in the rubber padding. If you can feel them distinctly in a new specimen, how will it look after several years of wear and tear? We count on the users of this pair of binoculars sharing their impressions with us in our database. Truncated pupils are also worth mentioning here – a clear sign that the producer tried to save on the size of the prisms.

When it comes to the optics, though, there are no reservations. You can be slightly displeased with the not very impressive sharpness on the edge of the field of view; still the wide apparent field of view, with good correction of coma, astigmatism, chromatic aberration or brightness loss more than compensates for it. The transmission, as you can find on a graph below, hardly breaks any records but there is nothing to criticize either. A result of 85% in the centre of the visible spectrum and over 90% for red light is good, especially if you take into account the fact that you deal here with a moderately priced roof prism device.

105223_nik8x30.jpg

To sum up we can write with confidence that the Nikon Monarch 7 8x30 made a very positive impression on us. It is a small, physically light and optically good pair of binoculars with a wide apparent field of view. Paradoxically, its biggest rival, the Nikon E2 8x30, is produced by the same company; it costs almost the same although its field of view is even wider. Still if you care about waterproof qualities, a bit lower weight and smaller parameters, the Monarch 7 will be a better choice.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2016-11-9 16:04  | 显示全部楼层
这镜,其实不太好评,毕竟是市场就这么定位的。但我觉得新手选择它,一定是正确的。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2016-11-9 16:28  | 显示全部楼层
baiqi001 发表于 2016-11-9 15:51
2,3年前测评的人多,现在有了国产平场ED,帝王7的性价比就不突出了。

重量轻主要靠多用塑料,这个不难 ...

那为什么大家都不用塑料呢?轻不是很好吗?
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2016-11-9 16:35  | 显示全部楼层
棱丝 发表于 2016-11-9 15:51
I’ve never tried to hide the fact that, in my opinion, real binoculars start from a 30 mm objective ...

谢谢,不过翻译过来的老外的评测极为拗口
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2016-11-9 17:10  | 显示全部楼层
openmind8325 发表于 2016-11-9 15:45
大家都说好,就没有人测了。

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2016-11-9 17:15  | 显示全部楼层

日本也就卖1900块人民币,而1900块人民币的普罗光学素质也就那样,何况屋脊呢。

屋脊与普罗,光学素质一致时,屋脊贵3倍,这几乎是定律。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2016-11-9 17:40  | 显示全部楼层
据说成像比较肉,锐度不太够。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2016-11-9 18:55  | 显示全部楼层
棱丝 发表于 2016-11-9 17:15
日本也就卖1900块人民币,而1900块人民币的普罗光学素质也就那样,何况屋脊呢。

屋脊与普罗,光学素质 ...

         
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2016-11-9 19:17  | 显示全部楼层
金牛座_fan 发表于 2016-11-9 17:40
据说成像比较肉,锐度不太够。

个人觉得锐度没有很大问题,缺点是良像范围不大,消光比较差、
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2016-11-9 20:58  | 显示全部楼层
锐度我觉得还行,亮度不错,消光是其缺点。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2016-11-9 21:02  | 显示全部楼层
这个评测多,见咔咔嘻嘻兄的″实用主义的选择"
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2016-11-10 22:39  | 显示全部楼层
tdnk 发表于 2016-11-9 21:02
这个评测多,见咔咔嘻嘻兄的″实用主义的选择"

有链接吗?
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2016-11-10 22:40  | 显示全部楼层
tdnk 发表于 2016-11-9 20:58
锐度我觉得还行,亮度不错,消光是其缺点。

消光是什么意思?
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2016-11-10 22:41  | 显示全部楼层
cdlinjin 发表于 2016-11-9 19:17
个人觉得锐度没有很大问题,缺点是良像范围不大,消光比较差、

良像大概是多少?
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注 册

本版积分规则

关于我们
关于我们
友情链接
联系我们
帮助中心
网友中心
购买须知
支付方式
服务支持
资源下载
售后服务
定制流程
关注我们
官方微博
官方空间
官方微信
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表