老外有人拿到150了,这台和富士的这台都是150系列里的低配版,apm上面还有150sd,富士上面还有150ed。原文在这里。
这里仅摘录对比部分:
I had a chance to compare a friend's Fujinon 150MT to the APM150 and it basically comes down to several reasons why there is no comparison.
The primary reason is being fixed at 25x with somewhat narrow feeling eyepieces makes the Fujinon severely handicapped. The APM with the 30mm UFF simply blows it away in every category, particularly in sharpness across the field and color fringing. The large 6mm exit pupil of the Fuji does not work great unless you have darker skies, and best powers for framing many deep sky objects is from 35x to 60x.
The Fujinon has straight through viewing which makes it awkward above 45 degrees for me using the factory pedestal.
The false color in the Fujinon shows up distinctly on bright stars, while making fainter stars less than perfect.
Using a pair of 32mm Masuyama eyepieces to match powers at 25x, I was looking at the Orion Nebula complex during sunset and it was easier to pick out stars in the APM well before they were visible in the Fujinon.
These factors would not be as problematic if I didn't compare the Fujinon against the APM, but the APM150 just takes it to another level.
本人有机会对比了朋友的富士150MT和APM150,结论是没什么好比的,理由如下: 主要原因是富士为25倍定倍,目镜视野又感觉有点水管,严重影响了富士的性能。 APM+30mm UFF目镜的表现在所有领域都秒杀了富士,尤其是全视野内的锐度和色边。 除非天空更黑,否则富士的6mm出瞳无法发挥,且看深空天体的最佳倍率为35-60倍。 富士为直视,原配基座观察45°以上天区不舒服。 富士的色差在亮星上非常明显,同时也使暗星星点不够完美。 APM+曾山32mm形成25倍,落日时分对准猎户座,能比富士150更早看到星点。 没有对比就没有伤害,APM150明显上了一个档次。
|